Should the Olympics find a permanent home instead of moving from one host city to another?
Teen Vogue recently sought the insight of Victor Matheson, professor of economics at Holy Cross and a renowned sports economist, on this issue.
Matheson, who co-authored a study in 2016 on the economic impact of the Olympics, says that finding a permanent home might make more sense economically since the Games have evolved into a money-losing endeavor for host cities.
According to Matheson, “no possible understanding of the benefits could possibly cover the cost of a typical Olympic Games these days.”
“There will be a significant one-time investment with a permanent location as the necessary athletic infrastructure is constructed and then continued upkeep cost, which would be much lower,” Matheson explained.
To read the full article, go to TeenVogue.com.
Comments are closed.